For this assignment, your team will be assigned to three or four (depending on team size) theoretical frameworks from a list provided in our Unit 2 Reading Resources. As a team, you will source and analyse articles that demonstrate the frameworks your team has been assigned , including at least one article that has a secondary research focus. There are three parts to this assignment and you are expected to adhere to APA standards for citations and references.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Note: In this course this assignment addresses Course Learning Outcomes (CLO) B: Develops arguments backed with evidence, C: Explains different forms of research inquiry and their applicability and use, and D: Critically analyzes various forms of research and writing. Please review all of the related assessment criteria as you create your final product. The assignment will be assessed using the following rubrics.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Part B Submit:<\/strong> Post the link to your team presentation in the Moodle Unit 2 Discussion Forum<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Part C Submit:<\/strong> Your completed Peer & Self Assessment document<\/a> to the Assignment 2, Part C: Peer and Self Assessment<\/a> dropbox in Moodle.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n Part A = 15<\/strong>% Team Project Grading Rubric<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Please rate yourself and your team members on the relative contributions that were made in preparing and presenting your position in Assignment Two \u2013 Debate. Please be candid in your assessment. Your ratings will not be disclosed to other students. In rating your group members use a one to five point scale, where: 5 = Superior 4 = Above Average 3 = Average 2 = below average 1 = weak. You can use 2 decimal places (i.e.: 4.5). Your mark will be based on the average of all ratings from your self and your peers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Download Peer & Self Assessment document<\/a>, insert your group member\u2019s names in the chart below with one name at the top of each column and then fill in, save and upload to the Assignment 2, Part C: Peer and Self Assessment<\/a> dropbox in Moodle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Part A Submit:<\/strong> To the Assignment 2, Part A: Theoretical Frameworks and Annotated Bibliography<\/a> dropbox in Moodle.<\/p>\n\n\n\nValue:<\/strong> <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Part B = 10<\/strong>%;
Part C = 5<\/strong>%<\/p>\n\n\n\nRubrics<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
For Part A<\/strong> only:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n \nCriteria<\/th>\n Excellent
(A+ to A)<\/th>\nProficient
(A- to B+)<\/th>\nSatisfactory
(B to B-)<\/th>\nUnsatisfactory
(F)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n Citation<\/td>\n Each annotated reference is correctly formatted using APA<\/td>\n Each annotated reference is mostly correctly formatted using APA<\/td>\n Each annotated reference is somewhat correctly formatted using APA<\/td>\n Annotated references are not correctly formatted using APA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Style, Grammar, Spelling<\/td>\n All grammar and spelling are correct<\/td>\n Most grammar and spelling are correct<\/td>\n Some grammar and spelling are correct<\/td>\n Significant spelling and grammar errors<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Theoretical framework<\/td>\n Theoretical framework for each entry is accurately identified and summarized appropriately<\/td>\n Theoretical framework for each entry is mostly accurately identified and mostly summarized appropriately<\/td>\n Theoretical framework for each entry is somewhat accurately identified and somewhat summarized appropriately<\/td>\n Theoretical framework for each entry is not accurately identified and not summarized appropriately<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Connection to learning and technology<\/td>\n Connection of the theoretical framework to learning and technology is accurately described<\/td>\n Connection of the theoretical framework to learning and technology is mostly accurately described<\/td>\n Connection of the theoretical framework to learning and technology is somewhat accurately described<\/td>\n Connection of the theoretical framework to learning and technology is not accurately described<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Key points<\/td>\n The key points made in the article are presented accurately<\/td>\n The key points made in the article are presented mostly accurately<\/td>\n The key points made in the article are presented somewhat accurately<\/td>\n Few or none of the key points made in the article are accurately presented<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nFor Part B:\u00a0<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n \n
\n Team: <\/strong><\/th>\n Team Presentation of Theoretical Frameworks (2B)<\/strong><\/th>\n\t\t\t<\/tr>\n \n Sample Categories<\/strong><\/td>\n Sample Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n Point Distribution<\/strong><\/td>\n Your Score<\/strong><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\t\t\t<\/thead>\n \n 1. <\/strong>Presentation Content<\/strong><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n \n
40<\/strong><\/td> <\/td>\n\t\t\t\t <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n 2. Teamwork <\/strong><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n \n
20<\/strong><\/td> <\/td>\n\t\t\t\t <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n 3. Technology <\/strong><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n \n
20<\/strong><\/td> <\/td>\n\t\t\t\t <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n 4. Application <\/strong><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n \n
20<\/strong><\/td> <\/td>\n\t\t\t\t <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n 100<\/strong><\/td> <\/td>\n\t\t\t\t <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nPart C: Peer and Self Assessment<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n